Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/pr/433'

Note that there will be no zsh 5.3.2; zsh 5.3.1 will be followed
by 5.4.  There might be 5.4-test-1 pre-releases, though.

* upstream/pr/433:
  driver: Improve comment about ^r pattern match bug
  driver: Adjust zsh version for probing for pattern match bug
  README: Fix FAQ entry about isearch highlighting
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Shahaf 2017-07-30 17:11:33 +00:00
commit b56ee542d6
2 changed files with 7 additions and 11 deletions

View file

@ -46,23 +46,19 @@ syntax highlighting.
### Does syntax highlighting work during incremental history search? ### Does syntax highlighting work during incremental history search?
Yes! Highlighting the command line during an incremental history search (by default bound to
to <kbd>Ctrl+R</kbd> in zsh's emacs keymap) requires zsh 5.4 or newer.
If you're using `history-incremental-search-backward` (by default bound to <kbd>Ctrl+R</kbd> Under zsh versions older than 5.4, the zsh-default [underlining][zshzle-Character-Highlighting]
in zsh's emacs keymap) then it works with _zsh version 5.3 and newer_.
If you're using `history-incremental-pattern-search-backward`, then syntax highlighting works
in _zsh 5.3.2 and newer_ due to [a bug in zsh](http://www.zsh.org/cgi-bin/mla/redirect?WORKERNUMBER=40285).
Under zsh 5.2 and older, the zsh-default [underlining][zshzle-Character-Highlighting]
of the matched portion of the buffer remains available, but zsh-syntax-highlighting's of the matched portion of the buffer remains available, but zsh-syntax-highlighting's
additional highlighting is unavailable. (Those versions of zsh do not provide additional highlighting is unavailable. (Those versions of zsh do not provide
enough information to allow computing the highlighting correctly.) enough information to allow computing the highlighting correctly.)
See [issue #288][i288] for details. See issues [#288][i288] and [#415][i415] for details.
[zshzle-Character-Highlighting]: http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Zsh-Line-Editor.html#Character-Highlighting [zshzle-Character-Highlighting]: http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Zsh-Line-Editor.html#Character-Highlighting
[i288]: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/pull/288 [i288]: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/pull/288
[i415]: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/pull/415
### How are new releases announced? ### How are new releases announced?

View file

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ fi
# Use workaround for bug in ZSH? # Use workaround for bug in ZSH?
# zsh-users/zsh@48cadf4 http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers//2017/msg00034.html # zsh-users/zsh@48cadf4 http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers//2017/msg00034.html
autoload -U is-at-least autoload -U is-at-least
if is-at-least 5.3.2; then if is-at-least 5.4; then
zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug=false zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug=false
else else
zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug=true zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug=true
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ _zsh_highlight()
# Remove all highlighting in isearch, so that only the underlining done by zsh itself remains. # Remove all highlighting in isearch, so that only the underlining done by zsh itself remains.
# For details see FAQ entry 'Why does syntax highlighting not work while searching history?'. # For details see FAQ entry 'Why does syntax highlighting not work while searching history?'.
# This disables highlighting during isearch (for reasons explained in README.md) unless zsh is new enough # This disables highlighting during isearch (for reasons explained in README.md) unless zsh is new enough
# and doesn't have the 5.3.1 bug # and doesn't have the pattern matching bug
if [[ $WIDGET == zle-isearch-update ]] && { $zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug || ! (( $+ISEARCHMATCH_ACTIVE )) }; then if [[ $WIDGET == zle-isearch-update ]] && { $zsh_highlight__pat_static_bug || ! (( $+ISEARCHMATCH_ACTIVE )) }; then
region_highlight=() region_highlight=()
return $ret return $ret