From ba1ef833be73d2b2f40e0205a6ce77871873f5fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:44:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] target/s390x: Update do_unaligned_access() comment Relative long instructions now depend on do_unaligned_access() too. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Message-Id: <20230316164428.275147-12-iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c index a7829b1e49..228aa9f237 100644 --- a/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ void HELPER(data_exception)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t dxc) /* * Unaligned accesses are only diagnosed with MO_ALIGN. At the moment, - * this is only for the atomic operations, for which we want to raise a - * specification exception. + * this is only for the atomic and relative long operations, for which we want + * to raise a specification exception. */ static G_NORETURN void do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, uintptr_t retaddr)