target/s390x: Update do_unaligned_access() comment
Relative long instructions now depend on do_unaligned_access() too. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230316164428.275147-12-iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
39ad734445
commit
ba1ef833be
|
@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ void HELPER(data_exception)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t dxc)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Unaligned accesses are only diagnosed with MO_ALIGN. At the moment,
|
* Unaligned accesses are only diagnosed with MO_ALIGN. At the moment,
|
||||||
* this is only for the atomic operations, for which we want to raise a
|
* this is only for the atomic and relative long operations, for which we want
|
||||||
* specification exception.
|
* to raise a specification exception.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static G_NORETURN
|
static G_NORETURN
|
||||||
void do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, uintptr_t retaddr)
|
void do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, uintptr_t retaddr)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue